OK, the real reason I wanted to put this picture in this file is as follows: I wrote a review of an episode of the Buck Rogers TV series which featured slavegirls who were fully dressed and I mean FULLY DRESSED. And I pointed out that women who served food while fully dressed on Earth were called "waitresses" because they were not in fact slavegirls?

Well, take a look a look at this woman! She's naked and I drew a gag on her. She could probably also have used a collar and one of those squiggly armlet things, and maybe a nice waist chain, but I think the gag makes the point all by its lonesome, which is: THIS is a fricking slavegirl! She's naked. All her naughty bits are hanging out for everyone to see, while everyone else is fully clothed. She's wearing a gag. She's there to be seen, and not heard. Even with a skimpy thong and bra set on her sleek little body, she'd be clearly identifiable as the slavegirl in the bunch. Film and TV are visual media, people. SHOW the audience that she's a slavegirl!

Why is stuff like this so hard to figure out?

Oh yeah, the woman in this photo is not all that naked psychologically -- you can see her eyes are smiling and if I hadn't drawn that gag in place, you'd see that her lips are smiling, too. But her lack of clothing along with the general clothedness of everyone else in the photo makes her look more naked. Call it a draw.